2009 Advising Conference Evaluation

  1. The conference website and publicity were:
    1. Excellent
    2. Good
    3. Neutral
    4. Fair
    5. Poor

  2. The registration process was:
    1. Excellent
    2. Good
    3. Neutral
    4. Fair
    5. Poor

  3. The Information Fair was:
    1. Excellent
    2. Good
    3. Neutral
    4. Fair
    5. Poor

  4. The keynote address by Susan Komives was:
    1. Excellent
    2. Good
    3. Neutral
    4. Fair
    5. Poor
    6. Did not attend

  5. The address by Donna Hamilton (Associate Provost for Academic Affairs & Dean for Undergraduate Studies) at lunch was:
    1. Excellent
    2. Good
    3. Neutral
    4. Fair
    5. Poor
    6. Did not attend

  6. My overall rating of the conference is:
    1. Excellent
    2. Good
    3. Neutral
    4. Fair
    5. Poor

  7. List the program sessions and/or conference activities that you found to be most valuable.

  8. Recommendations for future advising conference themes:

  9. Recommendations for future advising conference keynote speakers:

  10. Recommendations for future advising conference sessions:

  11. To what extent did the conference meet your expectations?
    1. All
    2. Most
    3. Some
    4. Not at all

  12. Which of the following best describe your reasons for attending this conference? (Check all that apply)
    1. Gather information to enhance an existing program
    2. Interested in developing a new program
    3. Give a presentation
    4. Overall professional development
    5. Professional networking

  13. What is your role in advising?
    1. Professional Advisor
    2. Administrator
    3. Faculty Member
    4. Staff Member
    5. Graduate Assistant
    6. Other

  14. How many years have you been involved in advising?
    1. Less than 5
    2. 5-10
    3. 11-20
    4. More than 20

  15. Additional comments regarding this year's Undergraduate Studies Advising Conference: